skip to Main Content

New Teacher Goals

In my last blog, I discussed how my experiences with coaching myself as a cyclist parallel my most effective strategies for coaching teachers.

Setting individualized goals is a key component. When I first tried out my biking shoes, I aimed for my husband’s goal: clip in as much as possible. After the second fall, I changed my goal: clip in wherever it is safe. I unclip on any stretch of road or trail that might bring surprises.

Often, new teachers—or their mentors—assume that a strategy needs to be implemented just as other teachers use it. They end up either biting off more than they can chew at first, or struggling inordinately with something that looked so easy when modeled by a teacher with very different strengths. Think for example about ways to develop student responsibility for materials. A new middle school teacher wanted to use a colleague’s chart for tracking which class had the highest percentage of students who came each day with pencil, notebook, and homework. ;Her mentor said, “That teacher is an expert at repeating routines and keeping track of details. You seem to like changing up routines. If you implemented his structure, could you be consistent every day?” The new teacher thought for a moment, laughed, and said, “No! By the third day students would be pointing out where I’d forgotten to award points!” She and her mentor then worked together to develop a simpler system, tied to her strength of building relationships and involving students.

As new teachers begin literature circles or small groups for math, tailoring the goals can be essential. When I train instructional coaches, I often have a more reflective and reserved participant role-play a young teacher who must implement literature circles. The role-players tell me, “Thinking back to my first attempts at small groups makes my heart pound even now—I was so worried about the noise and possible chaos!” Teachers with similar worries might start with circles for short stories or poems rather than novels, allowing for shorter cycles of trial, reflection, and revision of strategies. Or, they might seek out a more experienced teacher who is also introverted to get first-hand advice on managing all of the activity.

Or, think about teachers who prefer assignments that they can grade objectively, yet try to use another teacher’s choice-based assignment. They often become frustrated as they struggle to consistently grade radically different final products, even with the other teacher’s rubric. I encourage them to try an assignment with just two or three project choices, rather than a lengthy menu. And, we often grade together until the teacher is confident that he or she is applying the rubric consistently. In short, new teachers might embrace an assignment or strategy, but adjust the scope or the goal to something that is within the reach of their own strengths and experience.

Different teacher strengths, different teacher goals, Differentiated Coaching seems as sensible as different goals for cyclists, runners, musicians, chefs, surgeons…sensible any time we truly want to help each individual succeed.

Related Posts

Differentiated Professional Development

Of Course Teachers Can Become More Effective!

Tripped Any Teachers Lately?


Jane Kise is a consultant and executive coach. The founder of Differentiated Coaching Associates and author of over 20 books, she works with schools and businesses worldwide to help create environments where everyone can flourish.

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Gary, your comment illustrates perfectly one of the findings of my research on differentiated coaching–to be effective, coaching goals need to relate to the problems teachers are interested in solving or areas that involve their own keen interests! It’s the old “elephant in the room” effect–if you ignore it, efforts on other issues won’t be as effective.

    Thank you for sharing. Administrators need to understand the dangers of leadership that is strictly top-down.

  2. I’m sort of the opposite of a “new teacher,” but this post definitely resonated with me.

    I recently received an email from our department’s administrative supervisor with the subject line ” — has started the Goal Setting process for Gary L. Anderson.” I immediate thought, “Hey! What the whoa! Someone else is setting my goals for me?”

    It’s not actually quite as intrusive as it sounds, but the language reveals something of the philosophy behind our evaluation systems. I am required to focus my goals within a couple of domains, and I’m supposed to arrive at the specifics of those goals collaboratively with an administrator. In our district, the final evaluative label is pre-determined — I will be “proficient” — so when it’s all said and done, I have very little incentive to take this process seriously.

    Does that mean I have no goals? Of course not! I have numerous short-term and long-term goals, and I’m pretty serious about completing them. They will benefit the learning of my students and those of other teachers, as well as improve my teaching, and potentially that of many other teachers.

    It’s just a shame when decision-makers insist on systems that actually impede professional development and student learning. What if teachers’ goals were based on authentic needs and interests rather than ending up as square pegs pounded into round holes.

    Thanks for another insightful post, Jane.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: